Since this blog is meant to help newcomers to the indie world, I thought maybe I'd share some of what I found. Not only is it interesting to see how an idea evolves over time, it also might encourage those who are daunted by the finished products they play.
Few games, if any, spring forth whole like Athena from Zeus. More often, they're ugly, slimy, helpless little buggers, just like you and I were when we were born :)
A Little History
In April, 2011, I left my job at BioWare to try my hand at making games of my own design. NEO Scavenger was a foggy idea I had kicking around my brain, and was actually quite a different beast back then.
In fact, NEO Scavenger even had a different name: Post Apocalyptic Oregon Trail (PAOT). Here's a look at it's original design doc (pre-dating the design doc published in June 2011):
Title
Post Apocalyptic Oregon Trail (PAOT)
Survival/Strategy
What Is The One Sentence Story Line?
Exiled from MegaCity, the player must survive the wild wastes as he travels west in search of paradise.
What Is The Game About?
Salvage food, shelter, and tools from the wastes to meet daily survival needs, as you travel west to paradise beyond the mountains.
Game Overview
- Man against nature
- Plot your course west, one day at a time.
- Search for food in the wilds and wastes, to stave off hunger.
- Find shelter from the elements to stay healthy.
- Find and improvise tools to help in your journey.
- Balance the provisions you carry against the fatigue of carrying them.
- Manage inventory by arranging your belongings in pockets, compartments, and other containers like puzzle pieces.
- Find transportation to help you travel faster, at the cost of fuel and maintenance.
Differentiation Within The Category
- Focus more on survival through resourcefulness rather than gunplay
- Opposition is mainly environmental rather than soldiers, monsters, etc.
- Play style is more laid back and pensive than Resident Evil type survival games.
Franchise Strategy
- Free Flash game, licensed to game hubs
- Possible ad revenue through MochiAds
- Story establishes IP for POST (Note: POST was a working title for a post-apocalyptic setting)
Similar Titles
- Oregon Trail (I, II, Yukon, Amazon, etc.)
- Survival Kids (1, 2)
- Lost in Blue (1, 2, 3, Shipwrecked)
The game described is actually not too far off from NEO Scavenger, at least in terms of theme and gameplay. The focus on traveling west is different, as is the origin of the character (MegaCity exile). And the transportation bit is admittedly optimistic.
The "Franchise Strategy" is a completely different story, though. NEO Scavenger as a free, ad-supported game was based on the assumption that I would work on it for a few months, then launch. Little did I know that I'd be working on the same game for years (starkly against my own advice).
Also, revel in how little I knew about the survival genre. Granted, many survival titles have cropped up in the past two years. But I'm pretty sure I was missing several important titles in that market assessment.
NEO Scavenger's First Prototype
Perhaps a more telling example of my lack of understanding is NEO Scavenger's first prototype:
Press the "I" key to see the map in the prototype.
Impressive, huh? You can move colored blocks around a grid, and switch to a map view to watch our protagonist travel west from "Elis." There's some random weather variables, tracking of time, hunger, sleep, and distance, and the ability to choose between traveling or sleeping for the next 4 hours.
The next prototype added a fancy map to the background:
Not much more to do, though. I eventually added a more representative item to the inventory screen, and made each location contain two of those items. The player could take the "soup" at a given stop, and the character would automatically eat when hungry:
It even featured an end-game! Patient players would be rewarded with green text proclaiming "You Made It!"
It wasn't very fun, though.
There were some interesting systems under the hood: weather simulation; tracking hunger and sleep; and item management in a grid. But I found myself clicking the "travel" button thoughtlessly until I needed to recharge "sleep." There wasn't much to the gameplay loop. No strategy. No risk. No fun.
I started wondering whether it might be more fun to navigate a map rather than a line. What if the player had to choose where to go, and there was no guarantee food or encounters would await them in the direction they chose? What if moving around was more or less costly depending on the terrain? What if visibility was limited by terrain?
Also, I was hooked on Civ V at the time.
So I decided to try changing the game to utilize a hex map. And this is how that looked, initially:
Still not much to look at. In fact, almost all of the systems of the above prototypes were stripped away, here, and it was just turn-based movement on an hex map, with date tracking per-turn.
Visibility, though, was a big difference. Not being able to see the rest of the map, and having to choose which way to go, felt like an improvement over having a linear, prescribed path to follow.
And within a few days, I had this:
Now I was actually starting to enjoy the prototype. Exploring the map kept my interest, as I wanted to see how the world looked, and what landscapes I could reveal. Movement was more strategic, as I weighed visibility vs. movement costs.
There wasn't any tension nor risk yet, of course, but it was starting to feel like a "toy" rather than a "tech demo."
A week later, and there was day, night, and weather!
Still no risk vs. reward, but I was starting to get more inspired with each iteration.
It was at this point that friends were starting to ask more frequently what the point of the game was. And they were right to ask. I needed to take a step back, and come up with a plan.
I drafted a new design doc. I started prioritizing features and tasks against that design. And from that blog post onward, you can see the iterations NEO Scavenger passed through to get to where we are today.
Baby Steps
Getting back to the original point, it's important to remember that making a game is a series of baby steps. Your game might not start out very good-looking, or even fun. And as you can see from PAOT/NEO Scavenger's history above, it might even involve a false start or two.
However, determination is key. As an amateur (programmer/artist/designer), I had to keep pushing forward, despite my own shortcomings. I made a ton of mistakes, too. Some more than once.
Over time, though, the baby steps add up. The thing you're working on gets better each time you add something that's necessary, or take away something unnecessary. Your own progress becomes a thing that motivates you, rather than just hope and optimism.
And eventually, you enter the phase where you wonder when you should call your project finished. I'll let you know once I discover the secret to learning that lesson!
Impressive, huh? You can move colored blocks around a grid, and switch to a map view to watch our protagonist travel west from "Elis." There's some random weather variables, tracking of time, hunger, sleep, and distance, and the ability to choose between traveling or sleeping for the next 4 hours.
The next prototype added a fancy map to the background:
Not much more to do, though. I eventually added a more representative item to the inventory screen, and made each location contain two of those items. The player could take the "soup" at a given stop, and the character would automatically eat when hungry:
It even featured an end-game! Patient players would be rewarded with green text proclaiming "You Made It!"
It wasn't very fun, though.
There were some interesting systems under the hood: weather simulation; tracking hunger and sleep; and item management in a grid. But I found myself clicking the "travel" button thoughtlessly until I needed to recharge "sleep." There wasn't much to the gameplay loop. No strategy. No risk. No fun.
I started wondering whether it might be more fun to navigate a map rather than a line. What if the player had to choose where to go, and there was no guarantee food or encounters would await them in the direction they chose? What if moving around was more or less costly depending on the terrain? What if visibility was limited by terrain?
Also, I was hooked on Civ V at the time.
So I decided to try changing the game to utilize a hex map. And this is how that looked, initially:
Still not much to look at. In fact, almost all of the systems of the above prototypes were stripped away, here, and it was just turn-based movement on an hex map, with date tracking per-turn.
Visibility, though, was a big difference. Not being able to see the rest of the map, and having to choose which way to go, felt like an improvement over having a linear, prescribed path to follow.
And within a few days, I had this:
Now I was actually starting to enjoy the prototype. Exploring the map kept my interest, as I wanted to see how the world looked, and what landscapes I could reveal. Movement was more strategic, as I weighed visibility vs. movement costs.
There wasn't any tension nor risk yet, of course, but it was starting to feel like a "toy" rather than a "tech demo."
A week later, and there was day, night, and weather!
 |
| Day |
 |
| Night |
 |
| Rain |
It was at this point that friends were starting to ask more frequently what the point of the game was. And they were right to ask. I needed to take a step back, and come up with a plan.
I drafted a new design doc. I started prioritizing features and tasks against that design. And from that blog post onward, you can see the iterations NEO Scavenger passed through to get to where we are today.
 |
| Rainy nights with stuff to do, and things to fear! |
Baby Steps
Getting back to the original point, it's important to remember that making a game is a series of baby steps. Your game might not start out very good-looking, or even fun. And as you can see from PAOT/NEO Scavenger's history above, it might even involve a false start or two.
However, determination is key. As an amateur (programmer/artist/designer), I had to keep pushing forward, despite my own shortcomings. I made a ton of mistakes, too. Some more than once.
Over time, though, the baby steps add up. The thing you're working on gets better each time you add something that's necessary, or take away something unnecessary. Your own progress becomes a thing that motivates you, rather than just hope and optimism.
And eventually, you enter the phase where you wonder when you should call your project finished. I'll let you know once I discover the secret to learning that lesson!
