What is Haxe NME?
Haxe NME is two things, really, so let's start with the first part: Haxe.
Haxe (officially pronounced "hex," though I tend to pronounce it differently), is a multi-platform, open source, programming language. Using a syntax similar to Java or Actionscript 3 (AS3), one can compile applications to a wide range of platforms, including:
This, in turn, means that one set of source code can ostensibly be made to work on PCs, browser plug-ins, devices running iOS, Android, Windows Mobile, and webOS.
You might be thinking, "big deal. Java and Flash/Air already make that possible." For the most part, that's true. One difference, however, is that Haxe compiles into other languages, including ones required to make native applications. Java and Flash applications, on the other hand, are interpreted through a virtual machine (VM) on their target platforms.
With Haxe, one can write a single set of code for multiple platforms. And in theory, applications developed in Haxe have the ability to run much faster than VM-based applications like Flash, Java, and Air. It also means that Haxe apps can access features unavailable to some VMs, such as local file access and hardware acceleration.
And NME? What's that?
NME stands for Neko Media Engine, and is a library/framework for use in Haxe. It provides an API that looks a lot like Flash's (literally, many API calls are just a matter of replacing import flash.display.* with import nme.display.*), which can be used to deploy native apps to Windows, Linux, Mac, iOS, Android, webOS, BlackBerry, and Flash Player.
Haxe generates C++, which NME then compiles into the desired target platform's native code. The output applications use native components, such as OpenGL, libjpeg, curl, etc, to provide performance and features like what one would expect from writing platform-specific applications.
In a nutshell, it purports to generate blazing fast native apps on nearly every platform, using a familiar, AS3-like code and API. Even the compiling is simplified, requiring only that the user specify "flash," "windows," "ios," or any of the other target keywords to generate the desired native application.
Wait, are you porting NEO Scavenger to Haxe NME?
No, not yet. It's true that there would be performance benefits, and it would open up some handy local file access, modding, and other neat features. But switching technology mid-stride would be a pretty big risk. It would be a large undertaking, cause lots of down time, and there's no guarantee it would work.
However, NEO Scavenger's encounter editor is in need of an overhaul. Currently, it's built into the game, so that it can piggyback on various data-loading features already in place. That worked fine for the first couple hundred encounter nodes. It was slow to move things around, but I could mostly edit what I needed to.
With the recent influx of random encounters, though, there are over 750 nodes being displayed. And with each of those having UI elements to display, Flash just can't handle it. In fact, Flash can't even finish loading the data before it times out. I could rewrite the data loader to segment across frames (as I recently did for the save game load method), but I'm pretty sure that even after loading, the editor will be unusably slow.
So the editor is going to require an overhaul, one way or the other. I could do that in Flash, but I'll definitely be limited by rendering speed. Haxe NME should be faster, provided I can port things over. And it'll give me a better idea of whether it's worth building anything else in Haxe NME.
I've given myself a time box of a few days, in order to determine whether it's worth proceeding, or backing off and returning to Flash for the editor changes. So far, I've made enough progress over two days to encourage further work in the Haxe NME direction. Though, it wasn't without it's obstacles.
Transitioning from AS3 to Haxe
I'll start with an unqualified success: syntax familiarity. Transitioning from AS3 to Haxe has been trivial. There are some differences, but by far, the syntax feels very familiar. A large amount of the differences can be done with a search and replace, and the ones that can't weren't hard to figure out.
In fact, if you're using Haxe to target the Flash platform, that's about all you have to worry about. All of the API calls one used in AS3 are pretty much the same in Haxe. I was able to get a project compiling and debugging in FlashDevelop with about the same level of effort as a regular AS3 project.
Write Once, Run Anywhere?
Unfortunately, compiling code for non-Flash targets wasn't as easy as advertised.
For really basic applications (ones that use very few API calls outside of flash.display), worked well-enough. My editor used some drawing functions to make arrows and boxes, and these were well-supported. In fact, I was so emboldened by my first test app that I copied the editor's source over from AS3 wholesale, and started porting code. It was when I started delving into non-display libraries that things got ugly.
NME lacks a UI library like Flash's, so that was my first hang-up. There are some UI elements built-in, such as simple buttons. But complex items, such as drop-down boxes, radio buttons, and scrollbars were missing. Some effort has gone into UI libraries for Haxe and NME, but they're not as smooth to use nor as complete as what AS3 users will be used to.
Waxe looked like a pretty good place to start, but I quickly became stuck. For one thing, it seemed to be at odds with the NME way of displaying things, so it wasn't clear how to get them to play nice. The documentation was pretty sparse, too.
Joshua Granick's NME GUI library turned out to be a better fit, and covered much of what I'd need. However, it was still (apparently) missing a drop-down box, which was the UI item that I was currently stuck on. I decided I could probably make something work using basic UI building blocks, so put UI on hold while I vetted some other features.
NEO Scavenger uses some Flash URL libraries to request data from a server, and populates some tables in memory for running the game. The editor piggybacks on this code, in order to display encounters, their images, game items that connect them, and some other bits.
Unfortunately, compiling a C++/Windows target didn't seem to work, even though the Flash target did. And this is where we encounter a potential deal-breaker.
IDE Debugger Support
While the debugging process was identical to Flash development when deploying a Flash build, this was not so when trying the Windows target. There is no support yet for FlashDevelop IDE debugging a Haxe C++ target. There is a C++ debugger, but that is a command-line tool. One can set breakpoints in code, and it will pause, but then the user must interact with the debugger through a console.
One could also use on-screen text or trace, but as someone who suffered Maxscript's lack of IDE debugging for nearly seven years, I wasn't happy about the prospect of tracing my way out of bugs.
One thing I haven't yet tried is compiling the C++ output in Visual Studio, and debugging from there. Theoretically, that seems like it should work. The down side, however, is that I'm debugging C++, not the more user-friendly Haxe syntax. And worse, I'm debugging a target, not the source.
I looked around for quite a while, trying to figure out if I was missing something. Maybe another IDE was a better fit? Maybe I just didn't install hxcpp correctly?
In the end, I turned up little information to guide me through this problem. And that may be the other major flaw in Haxe and NME.
Haxe and NME have documentation, first of all. I don't want to make it sound like you walk away from the Haxe and NME websites with a box of tools and a noose.
In fact, Haxe has pretty extensive documentation, if we're being fair. Quite a few of my questions, particularly about object types, syntax, and language features were all answered there. And there is a growing amount NME documentation out there, too.
However, if you're a Flash developer, the current state of Haxe NME support is going to be a cold splash of water. Forget about typing a few keywords into Google and getting reams of documentation and examples to choose from. Worse, if you have a really specific question in mind, there's nowhere near the same chances of finding the answer posted someplace, unlike one does with AS3.
As I struggled with getting the nme.net API to work on the Windows target, I had to turn to a mix of old and new skills to find my answer.
The "old" part involved brushing the dust off my Maxscript debugging skills: tracing output, and displaying debug variables on-screen. It's clunky, and trace often doesn't output anything until the Windows target exits, but at least it's possible to tweak and get some feedback without having to jump between IDEs.
The "new" skill was learning to seek out answers to library and API issues in non-AS3 (non-Haxe, even) sources. When a URL request failed, I could dig up useful help around the web on libcurl, the library NME wraps in a Flash-like API for URL tools. It gave me more insight into why my specific case was failing. I could see, for example, what C++ devs would do to fix their issues, and then adapt those solutions to NME.
Based on the state of C++ debugging and documentation, I was almost ready to give up on Haxe NME, relegating it to the realm of "would be nice if it worked." However, pushing through those issues has given me some new-found courage. Enough to consider continuing my investigation, rather than retreating to AS3.
Haxe NME: The Verdict
Is it worth it? Is porting to or building in Haxe NME worth doing? That'll depend a lot on your aversity to risk. If your already using AS3, can handle some uncertainty, and have wiggle room for learning a new system, the benefits of speed, portability, and more features are quite tempting.
If, on the other hand, you need a predictable timeline, or reliable support, you may want to wait. Haxe NME sidesteps much of the cost of learning C++, but its relative youth means you'll be on your own from time-to-time.
For me, I've seen enough potential to warrant further investigation with the editor subset of NEO Scavenger. I was able to overcome the major obstacles so far, so I feel that I will be able to continue progress in the face of future issues. And in the worst case, I only stand to lose whatever time I am willing to devote to it. I can always return to AS3 if all else fails.
I'm interested to see how Haxe NME pans out. Currently, it stands in a sort of middle ground between Flash and Unity3D. On the Flash end of the scale, one has accessibility of development, wide consumer deployment, and cheap-to-free costs, but more limited output paths and performance. On the Unity3D end, one has fast and powerful capabilities on a very wide range of target platforms, but significant costs in terms of software and revenue share.
Haxe NME seems to offer the best of both at no cost, but does not yet have the community support and tools of the other two packages. Fortunately, that situation seems poised only to improve over time. If more people decide, like me, to give it a shot, we may see that community support reach a tipping point.
Interesting times may be ahead!